Tuesday, January 29, 2019

The Satanic Verses: Mohammad's Pagan Call to Prayer



     “God is the Greatest/I acknowledge that there is no God but Allah.” So says the first two lines of the adhat, the Muslim call to prayer when translated into English. In some Islamic traditions, however, Mohammad once offered a prayer to three Pagan deities in what has come to be called “Qissat al-Gharaniq”, “The Story Of the Cranes”, or most often, “The Satanic Verses.” What these three lines, as recited by the Islamic prophet, mean is obscure and has been a matter of debate for centuries.
     Not only the meaning of “The Satanic Verses” is elusive; their roots remain a matter of unknown origin as well. The earliest know reference to the words in question are attributed to the oral historian Mohammad Ibn Ka’b who transmitted the story to Ibn Ishaq a full two generations after the prophet Mohammad’s death. It is likely that the story was circulating socially before Ibn Ka’b incorporated it into his biographical account which was later recited to Abu Ja’far Muhammad ibn Jarir ibn al-Tabari who wrote an early biographical book about the prophet’s life.
     According to al-Tabari’s narrative, Mohammad was overcome by a strong desire to convert the Qurayshi tribes-people of Mecca to his newly founded religion. When he initiated the adhat with the intention of reciting the “Surat an-Najm”, a voice whispered in his ear “Have you thought of al-Lat and al-Uzza/and Manat, the third, the other?” Believing the voice to have come from the archangel Jibreel, the messenger from Allah that communicated with Mohammad on that god’s behalf, the prophet then announced to the people, “These are the exalted cranes whose intercession is hoped for.” Al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat were three Pagan goddesses that were worshiped by the Qurayshi people in the ancient city of Mecca and Mohammad appeared to be giving them his honors.
As the story goes, the archangel Jibreel later approached Mohammad and informed him that the voice he had heard at that time did not come from him; it had, in actuality, been the voice of the Shaytan, the Islamic equivakent of Satan. Feeling deceived and dejected, Mohammad went into a state of despair and was later forgiven by Allah for having made a mistake.
     “The Story Of the Cranes” circulated widely throughout the Islamic community for many years.      Muslim scholars commented extensively on its significance in the tafsirs, a collection of explanations on Islamic doctrine written by the earliest authorities of the religious movement. The story was, however, never officially accepted as one of the hadiths. Then, after being passed down from generation to generation for so many years, experts on Islam began to question the veracity of “The Satanic Verses” during the medieval era. Some simply dismissed the story as nonsense and slander that originated with enemies of the Muslim community in an attempt to sow doubt in the minds of the pious. Others claimed that some Qurayshis, in league with the Shaytan, had infiltrated the crowd of Muslims who had gathered to pray and, disguising their voices to mimic Mohammad, praised the Pagan deities in an effort to humiliate the early Muslims by making them look hypocritical. Still others dismissed it as misinformation since it contradicted the ideas written in the Qur’an, and since the Qur’an is, according to dogma, the perfect word of Allah, anything that contradicted it must be inherently false and heretical. And so “The Story Of the Cranes” faded from the minds of the Islamic community, rarely ever mentioned, and if remembered at all, thought of as little more than a footnote for lovers of obscure and trivial information.
     But then, repressed ideas of evil have a way of resurfacing once they have been dismissed as irrelevant. In the modern world, particularly as a result of colonialism, a handful of researchers, now derisively labeled “Orientalists”, started taking a stab at explaining the authenticity, origins, and meaning of “The Satanic Verses”. The revival of interest in this subject enraged the wrath of modern Islamic intellectuals, most of which invoked the concept of Allah’s power to discount the legend as heresy; their claim was that Allah chose Mohammad as his prophet so Allah would have protected him from being influenced by the Shaytan and therefore it would have been impossible for Mohammad to take instructions from the god’s biggest existential adversary. Another Islamist objection was that the story was an adaptation of Christ being tempted by Satan; a story that proved the necessity of keeping Muslims and Christians separate since the mingling of the two faiths would cause the theological pollution and degeneration of pure Islamic thought. Even so, the matter remained little more than an item of curiosity. That is, an item of curiosity until the publication of Salman Rushdie’s notorious novel The Satanic Verses in the mid-1980s, an event that caused a massive outcry around the world because of its unflattering depiction of Mohammad and his wives. The outcry led to the Iranian dictator Ayatollah Khomeini issuing a death threat against Rushdie due to his blasphemous satirical book.
     So what does it all mean? From the context of Ibn Tabari’s original biographical writing, it appears to be a parable teaching the lesson that Mohammad was a man, not a god, who was prone to making mistakes like all people and because of his devotion to Allah his mistakes would be forgiven. While this interpretation sound heretical to modern fundamentalists, an anthropologist would be quick to point out that concepts of heresy are products of the times that produce them; what is considered blasphemy to one generation may not be blasphemy to another generation. Actually it is traditional for Muslims to believe Mohammad was a man and not a divine incarnation, hence the reason that Muslims are forbidden from worshiping Mohammad in his tomb in Mecca. The idea that their prophet was perfect is a relatively modern and fundamentalist theological dogma.
     Of course, there is still one big question that needs to be asked. What if Mohammad was not the prophet of Allah at all? What then? Is this a question that only the Shaytan would encourage one to ask?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_Verses

No comments:

Post a Comment