Book Review
East of Eden by John Steinbeck
John
Steinbeck’s East of Eden is
a massive, sprawling novel about the intersection of two families in
the Salinas Valley of California. It is a complex weaving of themes
and psychologies but the length and well-strung together explications
of human relations should not deter the reader. Steinbeck’s writing
is lucid, fluid, and engaging; it succeeds in being easy to read
despite its densely woven themes. Three of these themes permeate the
story.
East of Eden
is a stage for a wide range of
characters, both major and minor. Adam and Charles are the sons of
Cyrus Trask, a Connecticut farmer who gets injured at the beginning
of the Civil War; Cyrus lies his way into contact with the highest
levels of government and gets rich by stealing. When he dies, his two
sons inherit his fortune. Adam and Charles are offhand
representations of the Cain and Abel story in the Old Testament.
Charles tries but fails to kill Adam. They
two eventually grow to respect each other, albeit at a tense
and uneasy distance. Adam takes his newfound wife Cathy to Salinas
Valley to start a farm. There they encounter Samuel Hamilton, the
patriarch of an Irish immigrant family. Samuel is a lovable old guy
who helps everybody he can; he has a predilection for making accurate
prophecies about the future, raising philosophical issues, and
inventing tools that get patented but bring no money to his large and
poor family. He can find water, too, which is why he becomes friends
with Adam Trask who
needs to dig wells for his farm. Meanwhile, Adam’s wife Cathy gives
birth to twins, shoots Adam in the shoulder, and leaves the family to
manage a whorehouse after changing her name to Kate. The two sons,
Aron and Cal, are like Cain and Abel reborn; their sibling rivalry
takes up the theme previously introduced by the childhoods of Adam
and Charles. Then there is Lee, the Chinese domestic servant who
loved Samuel Hamilton and raises
Aron and Cal in the absence of their mother. Abra
is Aron’s girlfriend.
The
novel starts our with a description of the Salinas Valley; two
mountain ranges are separated by a river. The landscape has a
presence in the book that permeates all aspects of the story. They
valley itself is symbolic since the characters are all separated from
each other while in close proximity, just as the river cleaves apart
the two mountain ranges that form the same valley. Adam and Charles
are divided by their competing love for their father; while Charles
can see that Cyrus Trask is a liar, Adam is unable, or
possibly unwilling, to see him in the same light.
Adam loves Cathy but she is just after his money. The Trasks and
Hamiltons live on two different farms but are dissimilar in that Adam
Trask seems to fall into wealth without any effort, and takes it for
granted, while the Hamiltons work hard and end up poor but closely
knit through a tight bond of love for their father, Samuel. The twins
Aron and Cal, like day and
night, circle around each other as Cal tries to win the love for
himself that he thinks is being given to Aron while it is probable
that Adam loves both of them equally even though he really
understands nothing about either one of them.
The
characters are also blind to aspects of themselves, even though these
aspects can be perceived with clarity by the others in the book. This
is like the phenomenology of Husserl and Sartre where a total and
complete understanding of the self is impossible since we only see
ourselves in fragments; it is up to ourselves to string the fragments
together and choose what they mean, all the while knowing that this
process can never be complete. After Cathy leaves Adam, Samuel has to
make him realize that he is ruining his children’s lives by living
in a self-absorbed trance of despondency. Adam was so depressed he
had not even bothered to give his sons names. The ever-naive Adam is
the one man who explains Kate’s true nature to herself; his
psychopathic wife is incapable of seeing the good side of any person
which probably is
the reason she becomes
so successful in her career as the madam of the seediest bordello in
Salinas (circus shows with donkeys performed for politicians?) Cal
has to explain Aron’s thinking and behavior to just about everyone
and most people do not actually see Aron for what he is since his
good looks make that almost impossible. Cal has to explain to Abra
that he thinks Adam loves Aron so much more because Aron physically
resembles Kate and
Adam has never stopped loving her. And so on. The different people
are so intertwined in their society that they can not be understood
without the others parsing and explaining their psychological makeup.
The hidden sides of each
person are revealed through the explanation of others and,
interestingly enough, some of these sides are hidden because people
lie. They lie to each other as well as themselves but quite often
this is done with good intentions. This brings up the issue of
choice.
Another
major theme that runs throughout East of Eden is
the conflict between good and evil; as Steinbeck says at one point in
the narrative, that is
the only story that has ever been told. Good and evil are the
extremes and all humans are caught in the webs that bind the two
inextricably together. What each human being is worth in the end is
what choices they make in the navigation of those webs. When
Adam realizes he needs to name his twins, he sits down with Samuel
and Lee to discuss the biblical story of the twins Cain and Abel.
After Cain kills Abel, God tells Cain that he can do good or he can
do bad, but he must choose for himself what he will do. This is
exemplified, as Lee says, by the Hebrew word timshel.
The
people who inhabit the communities of Salinas have to face choices
all along. When Lee decides to quit his job as the Trask family’s
domestic servant, he changes his mind and returns because he knows
he had found his place in the world as the guardian of the twins and
the best friend of Adam. Samuel feels
shy about confronting Adam during his depression but chooses
to do so because he realizes
he has
to help his friend. Kate chooses
to leave the family and restart in a lifestyle
that is
destructive to herself and everyone she associates
with. Adam has
to choose to confront Kate at the whorehouse so he can
move on with his life. Lee explains
to Cal that any bad things he does
in life are
his choice and he has
to own up to them
rather than placing blame on
an inherited nature he got from his mother. Aron
chooses
to run away from the good life that has
fallen, seemingly without effort, into his lap. The necessity of
choice and personal responsibility is the crux of the entire novel.
Jean-Paul Sartre would have said these
people were imprisoned in a
sea of choices.
The
third major theme in East of Eden, which
also serves a narrative function, is related to choice and the
conflict between good and evil as
well. Steinbeck describes
this as a pendulum swinging from one side to the other. At the
beginning of the story, Charles tries to kill Adam; he fails and the
two brothers grow up to respect each other. On the other hand, Cal
does not try to kill Aron but he blames himself for Aron’s death
and the two never reconcile their conflicts.
Another
pendulum swing involves both Adam and Aron who make the same mistake
in their love lives with similar but different consequences. Adam
builds up a fantasy about who Kate really is, falls in love with the
fantasy, and then gets devastated when the reality does not match.
Aron also builds up a fantasy, not just about his mother Kate who he
believes is dead and buried back East, but also about his girlfriend
Abra. Aron loses himself in
a religious
dream
about her purity and perfection but she realizes she can not live up
to his fantasy and liberates herself by losing her love for him and
pursuing a good life rather than a perfect life.
A
thematic
swing occurs between Cal and Adam when Adam loses a lot of money in a
failed business venture; Adam does not care much about his loss but
his son Cal does. While Adam is hopelessly naive about the way the
world works, Cal is worldly and
savvy at a young age and
catches on to business easily. He invests some of Lee’s money in
bean farming and makes a healthy profit only
to be disappointed when Adam refuses to take the money as a gift.
One
major narrative swing that may not be apparent at first glance is how
Lee replaces Kate in the family’s life. Kate abandons the family
for a life of vice but Lee remains to act as a mother figure. He
cooks, cleans, and does all the wifely duties except for one. Or is
it implied that he does that one too? Lee develops a relationship
with Adam that is so close you can almost consider them significant
others. Even Lee’s housekeeping is described as wifely; when the
sheriff pays a visit to the Trasks, he notices that the flowery
decorations in the house seem awfully feminine considering it is a
family of all men, something he attributes to the efforts of Lee
while also observing that Adam is oblivious to the décor. Just like
a typical married couple? Lee is a narrative auto-correction for Kate
without Adam realizing it. Kate leaves and never comes back; Lee
leaves and returns immediately because he loves his adopted family.
But Kate
is more like Lee than one might at first imagine as well. Both
of them use opium, by the way. As
the madam of a whorehouse, she watches over the prostitutes and men
who work there like a mother; while
she may not manage her stable out of love, she does watch over them
like a mother managing a surrogate family, feeding them, cleaning
them, clothing them, and doctoring them when they get sick.
The
pendulum swings inside the mind of Kate too. After
learning that Aron attends church, she goes to see him there. She
learns he will be going off to college soon so she contemplates
giving him his own private circus show as a going away gift. (Thanks
Mom, I guess you really do love and understand me after all) After
living a life of evil, she decides to leave her fortune to him as an
inheritance. She does not mention Cal in her will; she knows he
inherited her nature and Aron inherited her looks. Is the will her
final act of redemption before death? Or is it just one
further act an act of vanity?
Does she get fascinated with Aron because he resembles her physically
rather than because of what
he is like as a person? Maybe it is left open ended so the reader can
decide. Steinbeck encourages
us to draw our own conclusions.
While
Lee acts as a substitute wife and mother for the Trask family, he
also takes on anotherly
role when Samuel Hamilton dies. At that point he becomes the sage and
philosopher of East of Eden,
taking over where his idol left off. He becomes the advice giver for
Adam and Cal when they need help with making decisions; he subtly
steers the family ship while they flounder over the moral impasses of
their lives. But the death of Samuel is more than that; it is a major
turning point in the story. After the funeral, Adam builds up enough
courage to confront Kate in person so he can leave her behind. The
Hamilton family moves off the ranch, the children go to different
cities, and they begin to grow apart. The lives of the Hamilton
family members begin to recede and the lives of the Trasks become
more dominant.
After the poor inventor Samuel dies, the horse carts gets replaced by
cars and the technological gadgetry of the modern era begin to
appear. The psychological shock waves of World War I begin to affect
the community.
In
some ways, the Hamiltons begin to interfere with the narrative in the
third and forth sections of the book. Their stories seem to be
arbitrarily inserted without adding anything significant.
The story of Tom and Dessie’s deaths is interesting on its own but
does not fit into the larger picture in any meaningful way. By the
end of the novel, the Hamiltons are not even mentioned at all except
in Lee’s
brief references to the memory of Samuel. It is as if they just
disappeared from Earth without a trace. The writing has a couple
other problems too. Samuel’s speech is often interesting but
sometimes it gets so overblown it starts to sound pretentious.
Steinbeck’s sentences are sloppy too. He repeats words and ideas in
a way that reminds the reader of someone who stutters when they
speak. The sentimental and
episodic nature of the storytelling make it read like a soap opera on
occasion. And the end?
Steinbeck never really ends his stories; it is more like he simply
and abruptly stops writing and East of Eden is
not an exception. But the prose has more successes than flaws; in the
end if it works it works. The characters and landscapes are vivid and
once they have been described they can never be forgotten.
Finally,
the reader can do a disservice to themselves by trying to find too
many parallels between East of Eden and
the biblical story of Cain and Abel that inspired it. This is not a
retelling of that story; in the same way that James Joyce based
Ulysses on The
Odyssey of Homer, Cain and Abel
are a point of departure. It is not a novel of spiritual
transcendence but rather a novel of modern secular imminence. God
plays only a marginal role in this
book. The pendulum swings
between the ancient fable and the existential dilemmas of humans
trying to make sense of themselves and the world they live in with
choice in the face of chronic
uncertainty as their most
powerful tool. In the end we are left to wonder about the sparsely
detailed biblical story; what if Cain was not evil? What if he was a
confused teenager searching for love in a bewildering world and
mistakenly murdered Abel because he did not fully understand how to
make effective choices? Have westerners had it wrong all along? Is it
time to re-evaluate
the old myths and find a new
way to understand the world we live in? Probably but who really knows
for sure.
Steinbeck, John. East of Eden. Penguin Books, New York: 2002.
No comments:
Post a Comment