Sunday, February 3, 2019

The Fatwa Against Salman Rushdie: Blasphemy, Freedom of Speech and The Satanic Verses



     In 1988, Indian-born British author Salman Rushdie publishing his bombshell novel The Satanic Verses. The response to the allegedly blasphemous book was swift, loud, and hostile. People in western countries, while defending Rushdie’s right to freedom of speech, were mostly quite confused by the extreme reaction it provoked overseas. While the protests and debates have largely died down, the conflict over the right to free speech vs. condemnation for heresy remains unresolved.
The Satanic Verses is a satirical novel written in the magical realism style, a method that places ordinary people in surrealistic events and settings. The plot revolved around an Indian Bollywood movie star, Gibreel Farishta, who makes it big in London and insists on becoming British. The conflict between his Western and Eastern identities is symbolized by his mental breakdown and descent into schizophrenic delusion in which he, often humorously, believes himself to literally be the archangel Gibreel. In several sequences in the book, the man Gibreel Farishta has vivid dreams, while sleeping, about being sent by Allah to communicate his wishes to Mahound, an umistakable representation of Mohammad, the prophet of Islam.
     Some details of the story were deemed offensive to Muslims. There are several characters who speak out against Mahound, declaring him to be a fraud and a charlatan. It has often been pointed out that these characters were not portrayed as heroes in Rushdie’s depiction; they were parts of subplots that exemplified the opponents of Islam during Mohammad’s life and they did not represent Rushdie’s personal views on Islam. Another problematic subplot involves an Indian cult leader who takes her followers on a suicide mission to drown themselves in the sea in order to reach paradise; the cult leader’s name was Ayeesha, the name of Mohammad’s wife who he married when she was at the age of four. The most controversial detail involves twelve prostitutes in Arabia, each one taking a name of one of the prophet’s wives. It must be noted that these prostitutes were not actually portrayed as Mohammad’s wives but merely as whores who tried to capitalize off his popularity during his lifetime.
     Before the novel was released to the public, its publisher, Viking – Penguin, began receiving requests from Muslim leaders to halt its publication. The publishers went through with their plans and The Satanic Verses was first released in the United Kingdom in 1988. It was an instantaneous controversy and several countries around the world passed laws banning it on grounds of blasphemy. The first protest against the book took place in London, early in 1989. The demonstration was peaceful and was limited to a small group of Muslims who burned one copy of the novel. In 1989, the first American edition was released to wild critical acclaim.
     At that time, street protests in England began to grow bigger and angrier. Mobs gathered to burn piles of Rushdie’s books and the protests spread to several other Islamic countries around the world. Book stores and publisher’s offices started getting threatened, ransacked and bombed. Approximately a third of all bookstores in the US refused to even carry the book while some stores stocked it hidden away under the counter with their selections of pornography. Despite all the uproar, it was obvious that very few Muslims had ever read the book. At that time it was only available in English and in translation to a few other languages like French, German, and Japanese; it was mostly unavailable outside Western countries. The subject matter was also dense and complicated and required a vast amount of background knowledge to be fully comprehended. It seemed that Muslims around the world had been infected with the false notion that the book was a Satanist’s polemic against the Islamic religion, being published and propagated by Western conspirators who wished to destabilize the Muslim world to make invasion and conquest easy.
     The situation got worse when the Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini, leader of the Iranian Revolution of 1979 and then president of the country, went on the radio and, in Farsi, issued a fatwa against Salman Rushdie. The fatwa declared it a religious duty for all Muslims to hunt down and kill Rushdie for the crime of blasphemy and apostasy, for speaking out against the prophet Mohammad. Rushdie immediately went into hiding with armed bodyguards. He soon issued a public apology and begged for forgiveness. Khomeini was not impressed; he doubled down on his attack against Rushdie and the Western countries who supposedly sought to degrade the religion of Islam. Khomeini claimed there could never be forgiveness for apostasy. The six million dollar price tag on Rushdie’s corpse remained in place.
     The UK immediately ended all diplomatic relations with Iran, citing human rights and international goodwill as its reasons. Other countries did as well, saying that no member of one country had the right to declare a death sentence on a citizen of another country, especially without due process of law. Muslims throughout the world not only voiced support for the fatwa but many also tried to hunt down and assassinate the unfortunate author. Western intellectuals continued to defend the work of fiction on the ground of free speech. A small number of Islamic scholars also cited the fiqh, the Muslim doctrine of jurisprudence, to condemn the fatwa on the ground that the death penalty could not be administered in the absence of a fair trial. Other conservative religious leaders in the West regrettably took sides with Khomeini, saying that freedom of speech did not extend to the freedom to criticize religion.
     With hindsight it appears that the Ayatollah Khomeini had some ulterior political motives to issuing the fatwa. One is that he saw himself as being the world’s leading Muslim cleric and he wanted to gain an upper hand over Saudi Arabia in taking charge of the Islamic world. He wanted Muslims to rally to the anti-imperialist cause of his Iranian Revolution. He also wanted to drive a wedge between the West and the Muslim world, claiming that too many Muslims were embracing Western ideas of democracy, freedom and secularism. There was also the issue of The Satanic Verses’s depiction of Khomeini himself. One passage of the novel clearly depicted the Iranian leader as a demagogue using the cause of Islam to enslave his followers for his own egotistical gains.
     Khomeini soon died and the Revolutionary Guard of Iran contacted Rushdie to tell him they were no longer encouraging his execution. They did, however, refuse to end the fatwa by stating that only the man who issues the fatwa can cancel it. Salman Rushdie stayed in hiding for nine years. His wife, unable to stand the strain of living under cover, divorced him. He was forced to live with an assumed name and had to change locations every three days. Now no longer in hiding, Rushdie still receives death threats from Muslims about once a year. He is said to have made over $2 million dollars from the sale of his book.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Verses_controversy

No comments:

Post a Comment